The Boer War [DVD]

This documentary is 80 minutes long (just under 1 & 1/2 hours)...and combines all the things that I like about a documentary. 1. sober & objective narration 2. plenty of real imagery (in this case, plenty of photographs) 3. scholarly & informative (not fluffy content just "to entertain". If pay attention to this documentary one should come away after 2 hours knowing quite a lot about the Boer War..however this is the kind to watch again and again..as it is full of information that one cant completely "Download" into their brain 1st time viewing. Highly Recommend.

Good historical account of appalling colonialism. Slightly difficult to keep track of who is who and the differing locations.

To say "I don't like it" as offered by 2 star selection is not really accurate. It would be better to state that I am offended by the arrogance of the producers, concerning a number of matters. After more than 110 years there has been no attempt to correct offensive mispronunciation of names and places, often of names of internationally acclaimed figures. I am South African, of English descent, who had British connections lost in this war, and I cringe at the way the English, to this day still refuse to make any attempt to pronounce these correctly, Were South African commentators to mispronounce common English names,in this way, they would be castigated and ridiculed.Had the English narrator made some serious attempt to 'get it right', my assessment of the film would have been much more positive.His lack of sensitivity, like that of a large percentage of his countrymen, whose mispronunciation I have experienced, is unacceptable. The commentary also glosses over important issues, such as the terms of the Sand River(1852) and Bloemfontein(1854) Conventions, which recognised the political Independence of the Z.A.R.( 'Transvaal') and O.F.S (Orange Free State), respectively, and raises no questions about rapacious British Imperialism, or the pioneering role played by British interests, via the Chamber of Mines in creating the system of migratory labour,which transported rural tribal men to the gold and diamond mines to labour under oppressive conditions, in order to make gold mining profitable, as well as serving as the cornerstone of discriminatory labour legislation that characterised the Apartheid system. Much is said about the background and character of the British General Staff, but virtually nothing about their opponents. Trouble was taken to obtain recordings of popular 'Boer' songs of the time - 'Ou Tante Kooba' and 'Sarie Marais', but their value is entirely lost by the lack of sub-titles, and more particularly by the failure to refer to the content thereof, or the reason for their selection in the first place. I commend the producers on their collection of fine film material and stills. Perhaps the producers were unaware of the significant impact of the Concentration Camps on the mind of descendants of those who suffered there, particularly in the awakening of Afrikaner Nationalism, that eventually gave rise to the success of the National Party (Apartheid Government) in the 1948 election, that had much to do with the upliftment of those who had been impoverished by " Die Engelse Oorlog" ( the "English War"), as they knew it. The comment near the end, as the war entered the guerrilla phase, that 'Kitchener knew the land and the people', could not have been further from the truth! Restriction of the Franchise in Kruger;s Republic is not adequately handled. There WERE conditions under which foreigners could qualify for the vote, perhaps not as quickly as they wanted it. Examples of names and places that are routinely mispronounced, in brackets, include: Botha, a Dutch name, to be pronounced as the Dutch would have pronounced it ( not 'Boater'), Joubert, a name of French origin, to be pronounced as the French would say it ( not 'Youbot'), Boer forces. Boer means 'farmer', and the pronunciation is similar to the English word 'boor', which means something quite different! This was almost correct, but still had overtones of the typical English pronunciation ('Boa' - which is a kind of snake!). Reitz, President of the OFS is pronounced like 'Rates' in English ( not 'Rights'), Bloemfontein ( the 'oe' dipthong doesn't have an 'r' sound at the end ('Blermfontein'), Spioenkop ( 'Spy Peak') has an 'e' in it, and the same dipthong as in 'Bloemfontein', and the 'o' is not sounded as in 'top' but like the English dipthong 'au', as in maudlin ( 'Spionkop'). In Dutch and Afrikaans the 'v' in 'Veld', is pronounced as 'f' in English. Chritiaan De Wet's first name is not (Christian)The double 'a' is a lengthened sound, rather like the 'arn' in English 'barn'. Koos, the first name of De la Rey, is a shortened form of 'Jacobus' ( Jacob), and the double 'o' is sounded like the double 'o' in English 'boor' ('Coose', as in Highland cattle is quite different). 'Uitlander' means 'foreigner', which is what the English and other immigrants were(.'Uit' is pronounced like 'ate' or 'eight', and not 'Ootlander', with the same sound as in 'use' or 'loose'). 'Jan' Smuts was not ('Yan') but the -'an' is pronounced like 'un' in 'run'. You may be aware of his distinguished academic career at Cambridge, prior to assuming military leadership against the British, and possibly even know that he was a member of the British Imperial War Cabinet etc., as well as being significantly involved in drafting the Charter of the League of nations and the UN. surely well enough known to get the pronunciation of his name right? Perhaps the remarkably conciliatory attitude of distinguished Boer fighters, such as Deneys Reitz ( grandson of the OFS President), who, with many compatriots abandoned his homeland rather than signing acceptance of British authority, settling in Madagascar, before being persuaded by Smuts to return, whom he served as ADC, and was later an officer with the British forces on the Western Front, during the First World War, Not to mention the role of Smuts and Botha in the campaigns in German East and West Africa! This film would have been so much more authentic, had the producer/director taken the trouble to address the issues that I have raised. I could go on , but think that what I have said is sufficient for the purposes of this review.

This 2 part production is narrated by Robert Powell and resembles a very long lecture, illustrated by lots of contemporary line-drawings as well as some black and white film footage. If you want the war described battle by battle it's reasonably thorough, but it would have been a great deal better if it had given us the South African viewpoint, by which I mean interviews with the descendants of those South Africans who fought in the war and, at the very least, interviews with South African historians. I don't think there was any mention of Rudyard Kipling. There was no quoting from newspaper reports to give a flavour of how the British saw the conflict. At one point there was mention of "the natives" - referring in that old fashioned way to the black population. The notorious concentration camps were mentioned about one hour into Part 2 and took up only about five minutes. Again, a better understanding of this aspect would have been achieved if there had been quotations from contemporaneous source documents dealing with the problems of accommodating the civilians and the difficulty in combatting typhoid, a disease which killed half the British soldiers in the region let alone the civilians. It isn't enough to say that concentration camps in South Africa represented some of the darkest days in British history - we need some illumination, we need the powerful glare of publicity and we ought to be told which officials or generals or politicians were to blame. The production did mention the callous way the British troops burned down the dwellings of civilians and slaughtered their farm animals. There was surely a great deal of well-earned resentment towards the British which must have persisted for generations. As a nation, Britain needs to acknowledge what it did in South Africa as well as pointing the finger at the atrocities committed by other nations.

A good documentary about the political, economic and empire reasons for the war. A good description of both sides in the conflict and some of the battles. Information about the sieges, campaigns and battles was a bit limited so for example your told about the siege of Ladysmith but not much of what happened.

The doccie was done as if there were no other people besides Boers and Brits in South Africa. Quite shocking!Consider that at no time have whites exceeded 12 % of South Africa's population!! It is an apologia for British imperialism, slightly seasoned with Emily Hobhouse sensibilities. In every other part of Europe, outside Britain, the war was read as an act of outright aggression to gain control of the mineral rich country and as Hobson wrote: " “. . to place a small international oligarchy of mine-owners and speculators in power at Pretoria” and to “secure a full, cheap, regular submissive supply of Kaffir (sic!)and white labour. “ The majority of South Africans - the 88% unmentioned - except in passing - in the doccie, saw it as a war fought over someone else's country by rival imperialisms, anticipating the war that came in August 1914, fought by rival imperial powers to acquire control of colonies.

With so little on DVD covering this subject, the presentation was both well done and edifying.