

Desertcart purchases this item on your behalf and handles shipping, customs, and support to Colombia.
Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon : desertcart.co.uk: Grocery Review: Good value for money - Itโs excellent for sandwiches and salads and to put in pies X Review: Great to find on line - Great product
| Product Dimensions | 22.86 x 22.86 x 15.24 cm; 1.04 kg |
| Manufacturer reference | 890181 |
| Brand | KIRKLAND |
| Format | Chunk |
| Package Information | Tin |
A**N
Good value for money
Itโs excellent for sandwiches and salads and to put in pies X
B**M
Great to find on line
Great product
J**B
Value
Good price a tad bland missing a touch of brine
A**L
nice
a change from tuna...solid, chunky, good flavour...
M**M
Not very tasty
Firm and meaty but not a particularly nice taste
R**E
Great flavour and texture
This is more expensive than supermarket pacific salmon but well worth the extra. Great flavour and hopefully less exposed to contamination with plastic particles.
A**R
I will be making another purchase soon
The quality is pretty good. It tastes good and itโs easy to make salmon cakes.
C**H
Healthy choice
Down to the T
S**A
Good salmon. Good for you.
Made salmon patties for dinner last week. Very good.
L**T
Great tasting, good for you & your heart. How can you go wrong?!
All the Kirkland Signature products I've tried have proved to be very good and the Kirkland Signature Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon did not disappoint! I made salmon salad, like my tuna salad but with salmon. I sprinkled a little mozzarella on top and nuked it for a minute turning my open-faced sandwich into a salmon melt. It was delicious! FYI: I lightly rinsed it in cold water, like I do all canned meat such as Kirkland Signature's Chicken Breast or Albacore Tuna. It didn't have a strong fishy taste nor smell, so you needn't be concerned with that if it turns you off. Great tasting, good for you and your heart. How can you go wrong?!
M**.
Kirkland versus Henry & Lisa's canned wild salmon comparison: taste and more
I decided to do a taste test on Henry & Lisa's Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon versus Kirkland's Wild Alaskan Pink Salmon. I rarely use canned salmon except in summer, when I'll throw together a salad with HB eggs, perhaps some chickpeas, some Farmers' Market lettuce, and some canned wild salmon. By the time I've finished adding flavor with seasonings, herbs, the lettuce, and a delicious dressing, I don't even notice the taste of canned salmon. I've been buying the Kirkland for years, but decided to try the H&L. Texture: both brands were identical in texture: no bones, cartilage, or skin, which I used to find in some supermarket brands, even TJ's. Taste: almost identical in taste, but H&L had the tiniest bit more salmon flavor. Both had the same degree of saltiness. Both have same ingredients: only salmon and salt. BPA: H&L has the edge with BPA-free cans, whereas Kirkland is silent on BPA. Can: H&L has the edge with a pop-top can opener. Finally, Kirkland has the edge in price: I paid $22.14 for 6 cans a couple of weeks ago, which is $3.69 per can. However, as I write this, the price is $24.35, or $4.06. H&L was $19.16 for 4 cans, which is $4.79 per can, but today is $18.20, which is $4.55 per can. So it's buyer's choice according to what matters most to you: price, convenience, or BPA. I'll probably stick with the H&L because of the BPA-free cans.
Trustpilot
1 month ago
1 month ago
2 weeks ago
1 week ago